Huh. Impressed a bit here...
Mar. 24th, 2006 07:33 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Here's a step in the right direction...
Of course, get this gem (quoted from the article):
The bill's chief sponsor, Rep. Ron Hood, contends that children raised by gay parents face increased risk of physical and emotional problems. His concerns are shared by many conservative groups which argue that same-sex partnerships are less stable than heterosexual marriages.
No shit. You think?
Ever occur to you the reason behind that is because you try to get legislation passed that essentially states 'the general public thinks this lifestyle choice is wrong and we will do anything to stop it'? Or that same-sex relationships fall apart a lot of times from sheer social pressure?
No? Hmn. Maybe that's part of the problem.
Not only do same-sex partners have to deal with ALL of the usual marriage problems (without any of the governmental benefits, either--like, say, TAX BREAKS--that hetero pairs get, or legal recognition, like having a legally acknowledged marriage), but they have to deal with harassment, constantly changing laws that usually end up in worse shape than when they started, harassment, losing their children and livelihood if the locals don't like it, harassment...
I said that already, didn't I?
Anyway--point being--of COURSE the relationships aren't as stable--there's incredible outside pressure for it NOT to work.
Try actually supporting the lifestyle just like you do for hets...bet me it would settle down into the same stats for 'things going wrong' once all the extraneous pressure is gone.
But hey, what do I know, right?
Oops...I'm on the soap box. XD.
Anyhow...good going on the adoption people.
BAD legislator. Get with the program.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 03:18 pm (UTC)2. LIMECAT.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 09:06 pm (UTC)YAYS LIMEKITTY!!!
*cough*
I will have to get more icons like that once I pay for this LJ.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 03:22 pm (UTC)I mean, I haven't followed the situation very deeply, but it has seemed hopeful here.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 09:13 pm (UTC)oooooohhhhhh.
*g*
I follow it off and on. For TMI's sake, I'm bi and am in a same-gender relationship at the moment, so it has some relevance in my life. Even if neither applied to me, though, the sheer craziness of the opposing factions is one big head shake. This stuff has been going on 'underground' for as long as humans were human, and nothing has fallen apart because of it yet.
Just another 'live and let live' situation people need to relax about.
Hopefully, the hopeful part will spread. Sadly, most places seem to be going in the opposite direction at the moment. :/
no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 06:06 pm (UTC)Um, have these people checked the stats on the divorce rates in this country? And how many hetero couples have horrid relationships--that negatively affect their children--and never get a divorce?
Weak, weak argument, if you ask me.
BTW--how's it going? Long time no type. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-25 09:18 pm (UTC)There isn't really much to be done, either. They're pretty set in stone as far as 'tude goes. Even if you presented the facts to them, they would at least try to find a way to counter-act them. Denial can be a very powerful force when wielded
with EBIL intentwell.And yeah, hey there. Long time no see to you too. ^^
I've been around, getting myself together and just having a blast in places other than the old. Sadly, most of my online LJ time has been given (along with my soul) to one favored pup. He even has a paid account where-as I don't! LOL.